Which messages to feed to Bayes?
Kevin.Spicer at BMRB.CO.UK
Fri Feb 27 09:52:13 GMT 2004
Jan-Peter Koopmann wrote:
> is that really true? Of course it would be perfect to get the
> original message. But a changed header does not automatically
> mean that learning the rest of the message does not make
> send, does it? The database will still learn from the body,
> that the words are considered to be spammy.
The most important thing is that the messageID is preserved as SA uses that as a key. If the messageID is not preserved salearn won't realise that it has already learned from the message. This means it will learn the message twice (once as ham and once as spam) rather than relearning it.
+44 (0)20 8566 5000
This message (and any attachment) is intended only for the
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. If you have received this in error, please contact the
sender and delete this message immediately. Disclosure, copying
or other action taken in respect of this email or in
reliance on it is prohibited. BMRB International Limited
accepts no liability in relation to any personal emails, or
content of any email which does not directly relate to our
More information about the MailScanner