Which messages to feed to Bayes?

[Spicer, Kevin]

Jan-Peter Koopmann wrote:
> is that really true? Of course it would be perfect to get the
> original message. But a changed header does not automatically
> mean that learning the rest of the message does not make
> send, does it? The database will still learn from the body,
> that the words are considered to be spammy.

The most important thing is that the messageID is preserved as SA uses that as a key.  If the messageID is not preserved salearn won't realise that it has already learned from the message.  This means it will learn the message twice (once as ham and once as spam) rather than relearning it.



BMRB International 
http://www.bmrb.co.uk
+44 (0)20 8566 5000
_________________________________________________________________
This message (and any attachment) is intended only for the 
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
material.  If you have received this in error, please contact the 
sender and delete this message immediately.  Disclosure, copying 
or other action taken in respect of this email or in 
reliance on it is prohibited.  BMRB International Limited 
accepts no liability in relation to any personal emails, or 
content of any email which does not directly relate to our 
business.