Bug in Maximum Attachments Per Message (Was: Re: Problem with list digests)

[Csillag Tamás]

Hi,

It means that I made a mistake as I set 'Maximum Attachments Per Message' too low.
This caused the problem.

But this raises a bug in MailScanner. As you mentioned: it did not add
*nothing* after Full headers (Teljes Fejléc).

The problem was in our settings but mailscanner should tell us what's
going on.

The recipient do not receive the reason of '{Blocked Content}' too.

Thanks.

On 02/26, Julian Field wrote:
> That apparently contains a totally blank report. Someone has screwed up 
> something in your reports for that to happen. What is the "Teljes fejlec::" 
> text doing there? What does it mean anyway?
> 
> At 16:22 26/02/2004, you wrote:
> > Thanks for the prompt response.
> >
> > The report reads:
> >
> >-------------8<---------------------------------------------------------
> >Subject: Figyelem: E-mail virus! (A manus.itk.ppke.hu-n)
> >
> >A kovetkezo e-mail uzenetek virusokat tartalmaztak:
> >
> >    Sender: pasztor at lex.jak.ppke.hu
> >IP Address: 127.0.0.1
> > Recipient: pasztor at manus.itk.ppke.hu
> >   Subject:  Mailman-Users Digest, Vol 17, Issue 67
> > MessageID: 1AwOCp-0004xZ-9U
> >    Report:
> >Teljes fejlec::
> >
> > Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=manus.itk.ppke.hu)
> >        by localhost.manus.itk.ppke.hu with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
> >        id 1AwOCp-0004xZ-9U
> >        for pasztor at manus.itk.ppke.hu; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:17:47 +0100
> > Received: from lex.jak.ppke.hu (lex.jak.ppke.hu [195.111.132.3])
> >        by manus.itk.ppke.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CA9E5C
> >        for <pasztor at ppke.hu>; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:17:47 +0100 (CET)
> > Received: from localhost (lex [127.0.0.1])
> >        by lex.jak.ppke.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBE16BAA
> >        for <pasztor at ppke.hu>; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:18:56 +0100 (CET)
> > Received: from lex.jak.ppke.hu (lex.jak.ppke.hu [195.111.132.3])
> >        by lex.jak.ppke.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B164D86
> >        for <pasztor at ppke.hu>; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:18:52 +0100 (CET)
> >-------------8<---------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > It's partly in Hungarian, but I'm sure you get it.
> >
> >On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Julian Field wrote:

-- 
cstamas