bayes

Kevin Spicer kevins at BMRB.CO.UK
Thu Feb 12 22:16:40 GMT 2004


On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 22:06, Matt Kettler wrote:

> It's 100% impossible for SA to ever bayes_learn from a generic forwarded
> message. Most forwards have lost their headers, had text added to the body,
> HTML re-encoded by the client, attachments stripped, multipart/alternatives
> covnerted to singlepart or vice-versa, etc.
>
> SA MUST be fed a message that has original, unmangled body, and the
> original headers included. Anything else will poison your bayes database.

Worth noting that (IIRC) SA uses the messageID as a key, so if you want
to relearn a message that was identified as ham as spam (or vice versa)
you must preserve the headers, so that SA can realise that it previously
learned the message and so unlearn it before learning it correctly.




BMRB International
http://www.bmrb.co.uk
+44 (0)20 8566 5000
_________________________________________________________________
This message (and any attachment) is intended only for the
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  If you have received this in error, please contact the
sender and delete this message immediately.  Disclosure, copying
or other action taken in respect of this email or in
reliance on it is prohibited.  BMRB International Limited
accepts no liability in relation to any personal emails, or
content of any email which does not directly relate to our
business.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list