ANNOUNCE: Beta 4.37.3 released

[Alex Neuman van der Hans]

The logic is that Archiving is done "pre" spam and virus checks if I recall
correctly. The only way to overcome this is to
reject mail using RBL's or milters (like milter-sender and clamav-milter) at
the MTA level. Also helps keep your cpu utilization low, as MailScanner has
less left to do.

Does anybody know if there's an MTA-level way for Sendmail to reject mail
based on SPF, like an SPF-milter, that works well?

-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf
Of Brian Parish
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 8:44 PM
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Beta 4.37.3 released

On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 03:05 am, Alex Neuman van der Hans wrote:
> Too bad you can't do a "keep 'Archive Mail' Archive clean"...

Yes - I've been meaning to ask about this.  Archived mail skips virus
checking
- correct?  If so, I don't understand the logic of this.

best regards
Brian

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------ To
unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and the
archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!