Virus Scanners!

[Scott Silva]

    [ The following text is in the "ISO-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
    [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

xterm1 wrote:
|         I have just a simple question. I have 3 Virus scanners running
with
| MailScanner. Would
| I be wasting Resources, or is it not such a bad Idea! I feel that if 1 or
| maybe 2 out of the 3
| miss a virus the other will catch it!  I by no means have a critical setup
| IE Corporate/Business
| But I despise the incoming spam and Virus's!
|
|         Thoughts or rants Welcome!
I am also using 3 -- McAfee, Clam and BitDefender. Spamassassin seems to
use more resources than the virus scanners IMHO
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBvgYJRADw9lziUqQRAiXAAJ4tH2OQz9J3GJmM/fvz7fVklRd2TQCfZgsL
b9J4cJyfEb7ylJlbcw95r5I=
=Yc/2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!