Postfix, mailwatch and queue IDs (and of course mailscanner:-)

[Steen, Glenn]

Eh, ok... It's the patch I got from you, so... I thought you'd have
it already;).

Anyway, here you go...

-- Glenn

> -----Original Message-----
> From: MailScanner mailing list 
> [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Julian Field
> Sent: den 3 december 2004 14:03
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: Postfix, mailwatch and queue IDs (and of course 
> mailscanner:-)
> 
> 
> You forgot to include the patch!
> 
> Steen, Glenn wrote:
> 
> >Julian,
> >
> >I've been running this patch to Postfix.pm on the new, not
> >"misconfigured" server (running 4.35.11 ATM, will upgrade RSN) for
> >a week now.
> >It is still totally problem-free, and during this time it has "saved
> >me" from 4 diplicates in 8794 messages (just goes to show 
> the effect of
> >having /var/spool "separated" from /var:-).
> >
> >I noted it isn't present in 4.36.4... Could it 
> (pretty-please) go into
> >at least the next beta? All users of Postfix and MailWatch 
> (or similar
> >tool) in conjunction with MS would benefit from it.
> >
> >Kind regards
> >
> >-- Glenn (still waiting eagerly for the book to arrive... Perhaps a
> >nice Xmas surprise:-)
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: MailScanner mailing list
> >>[mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Steen, Glenn
> >>Sent: den 29 november 2004 17:33
> >>To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> >>Subject: Re: Postfix, mailwatch and queue IDs (and of course
> >>mailscanner:-)
> >>
> >>
> >>Hi Julian (& all:),
> >>
> >>I decommissioned the old server on friday, so now I've got a more
> >>"normal" server setup... Meaning I should see a lot less of the
> >>duplicates that was bothering me. To be completely sure 
> I'll never see
> >>any, I'll continue to use the patch (still rock solid) on the "new"
> >>server.
> >>
> >>Final count shows that during the week it was in effect on the
> >>"slightly missconfigured" server it protected me from 141 new
> >>duplicates (in 8941 messages... Yeah, things have been pretty slow,
> >>especially since we've started blocking the worst offenders at the
> >>firewall:-).
> >>
> >>Many thanks.
> >>
> >>Perhaps time for others to enjoy it too?
> >>
> >>-- Glenn
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: MailScanner mailing list
> >>>[mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Steen, Glenn
> >>>Sent: den 22 november 2004 17:40
> >>>To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> >>>Subject: Re: Postfix, mailwatch and queue IDs (and of course
> >>>mailscanner:-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>(snip)
> >>
> >>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: MailScanner mailing list
> >>>
> >>>
> >>[mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On
> >>
> >>
> >>>Behalf Of Julian
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Field
> >>
> >>
> >>>Sent: den 18 november 2004 22:58
> >>>To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> >>>Subject: Re: Postfix, mailwatch and queue IDs (and of course
> >>>mailscanner:-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Steen, Glenn wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>(snip)
> >>
> >>
> >>>>Should perhaps go into the beta? I can see no real
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>drawbacks with it.
> >>
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>Let's leave it running for a few days first. If it behaves
> >>>itself (which
> >>>it should) then it will go in the main distribution, as it 
> is A Good
> >>>Thing(tm). As you say it is transparent to MailWatch, then
> >>>
> >>>
> >>if it works
> >>
> >>
> >>>at all it should be fine.
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Julian Field
> >>>
> >>>
> >>(snip)
> >>
> >>------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
> >>'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
> >>Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
> >>the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
> >>
> >>Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
> >'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
> >Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
> >the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
> >
> >Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Julian Field
> www.MailScanner.info
> Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
> Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
> 
> PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
> 
> ------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
> To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
> 'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
> Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
> the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
> 
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
> 

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!

    [ Part 2, "Postfix.pm.inode.patch"  Application/OCTET-STREAM (Name: ]
    [ "Postfix.pm.inode.patch")  2.2KB. ]
    [ Unable to print this part. ]