MailScanner beta release 4.33.1

[Julian Field]

<x-flowed>
At 15:25 28/08/2004, you wrote:
>Hi!
>
> > >I also mailed Julian offlist, i saw a large peak in CPU when i upgraded to
> > >the last beta, moved back to last stabil now and all seems just fine.
> >
> > Anyone else seeing the same problem? If so, does SA 2.6x versus SA 3 make a
> > difference?
> >
> > I have added the
> >          lock_method flock
> > line to the spam.assassin.prefs.conf which should speed up bayes locking in
> > SA 3.
> >
> > Other than that, there really aren't any changes from the previous version
> > in code that is executed a lot, so I can't see what's happening.
>
>I also noticed that even when i have the MCP Checks = no i get log entry's
>like:
>
>Aug 28 13:46:23 vmx03 MailScanner[26483]: MCP Checks: Starting
>Aug 28 13:46:28 vmx03 MailScanner[26478]: MCP Checks: Starting

Yes, that's normal. All it is doing is logging where the MCP checks would
start. As you might be doing MCP checks on some messages and not on others,
it's not trivial to work out if MCP checks are happening at all.
--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
</x-flowed>