Possible message corruption doing hold queue access...

[David H.]

<x-flowed>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Smart,Dan wrote:

| I'm doing some research and evaluation of using MailScanner with
Postfix and
| SpamAssassin.  I am concerned that the primary author of Postfix
recommends
| against using MailScanner since it reads the hold queue file directly
| instead of using the LMTP protocol as amavis-new does.
|
| Does anyone have any opinions on the likelihood of message corruption, and
| the pros and cons of MailScanner in comparison to amavis-new?
|
| <<Dan>>
|
THere have been lots of discussions in the past concerning Postfix and
MailScanner. In short ... do you _have_ to use Postfix? If not, _I_
would _personally_ recommend you use a different MTA:
*Personally I see no reason for using Postfix in the first place
anyways, but that is just me)-

Aopart from that Julian's method seems to work for those who use Postfix.
|

- -d
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.6 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFBGo2IPMoaMn4kKR4RA8kwAJ9jyauBD8tcHgMSIoT3T2s1NPG35wCfWH7b
HTNq5kyvJ55zElpi4LNgHt0=
=dcYZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).
</x-flowed>