Possible message corruption doing hold queue access...

[Kevin Miller]

Smart,Dan wrote:
> I'm doing some research and evaluation of using MailScanner with
> Postfix and SpamAssassin.  I am concerned that the primary author of
> Postfix recommends against using MailScanner since it reads the hold
> queue file directly instead of using the LMTP protocol as amavis-new
> does.
>
> Does anyone have any opinions on the likelihood of message
> corruption, and the pros and cons of MailScanner in comparison to
> amavis-new?

Lots of posts about that - check the archive.  There was a bunch just last
week or the week before as a matter of fact...

...Kevin
--
Kevin Miller                Registered Linux User No: 307357
CBJ MIS Dept.               Network Systems Administrator, Mail
Administrator 155 South Seward Street     ph: (907) 586-0242
Juneau, Alaska 99801        fax: (907 586-4500

------------------------ MailScanner list ------------------------
To unsubscribe, email jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk with the words:
'leave mailscanner' in the body of the email.
Before posting, read the MAQ (http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/) and
the archives (http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html).