SPF

[Res]

<x-flowed>
Mike,

On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Mike Kercher wrote:

> SA3.x already supports it

Problem is SA slows our server dow to a wet weak, we dont use MailScanner
to do RBL's (simple because we have a customized mc file for sendmail that
includes it, amongst doing rfc1912 checks etc, or spam checks with SA, but
would consider using the SPF option, SA is just too damned slow on these
servers, that cop a thrashing.


>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: MailScanner mailing list
>> [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Res
>> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 10:36 PM
>> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>> Subject: SPF
>>
>> Julian,
>>
>> Any plans to introduce SPF record checking?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Res
>>
>> -------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
>> To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
>> Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
>> http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
>> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
>>
>
> -------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
> To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
> Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
> http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
>

--
Regards,
Res

-------------------------- MailScanner list ----------------------
To leave, send    leave mailscanner    to jiscmail at jiscmail.ac.uk
Before posting, please see the Most Asked Questions at
http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/     and the archives at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/mailscanner.html
</x-flowed>