HTML.

[Ugo Bellavance]

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Erik Jakobsen [mailto:eja at URBAKKEN.DK]
>Envoyé : 13 avril, 2004 13:42
>À : MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>Objet : Re: HTML.
>
>
>Jan-Peter Koopmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday, April 13, 2004 5:52 PM Erik Jakobsen 
><mailto:eja at URBAKKEN.DK> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>And I obviously ask too much. Then its better to stop.
>> 
>> 
>> Wrong. Asking is no problem. On the contrary. BUT it would 
>be nice if you started to have a 
>
>look at the FAQ/MAQ and the archives before posting a question. Many 
>questions (and obviously most
>
>  of the ones you asked here) have been discussed before. You 
>would save 
>yourself and us quite some time.
>> 
>> That does by no means mean that you should not ask questions 
>if you did not find the answer at other
>
>  (obvious) places.
>
>Tell me damn where to find it. You act as Ugo does. Ugo has a 
>revenge on 
>me I know, but I don't want to fight a war here.

Hey, I have absolutely nothing against you, except the fact that you often misunderstand what we write to you.

>
>
>I think this is the reply I got, that its wrong to ask. Ugo 
>ought to be 
>a nice man, but not now as he attacked me. There is many ways 
>in telling 
>people what one mean. The reply I got from him was a single word. This 
>is to claim at. This is the same as if one ask, and writes "its not 
>working". He answered me "Use rulesets". What ruleset ?. how could I 
>know it.
>
>Then Jan-Peter. Please in very deep details tell me how to ask here on 
>this mailinglist.

 http://www.mailscanner.biz/maq/#rulespost

I spent about 40 hours writing this page, and I still have to work on it, so please be kind enough to spend 5 minutes to read it.

I'm not attacking you, btw­.  Since I wrote the MAQ, I tell everyone to go to the maq, faq before posting and no one objected yet.

>
>I don't want to be here, getting as attacked as I have been here.
>And I'm really wondering why, because its the first time I have been 
>treated like this.

If it is a reference to a discussion you had with me earlier, the only thing I can say is that you totally misunderstood many of my statements.  I think it is probably a language issue, but I don't know.  Now I try to be as clear as I can with you.