spamassassin - deferred mail

[Rodney Green]

Thanks! Setting the maximum child processes to "1" seems to have fixed 
the problem.

Ugo Bellavance wrote:

>>-----Message d'origine-----
>>De : Rodney Green [mailto:rgreen at TRAYERPRODUCTS.COM] 
>>Envoyé : 8 avril, 2004 14:39
>>À : MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>>Objet : Re: RE : spamassassin - deferred mail
>>
>>
>>Thanks Ugo. This machine does only have 128mb of RAM. I put 
>>in a request 
>>a couple of weeks ago for purchasing more memory for it. 
>>Hopefully we'll 
>>get it soon.
>>    
>>
>
>If you have a low volume, lower your max child processes.
>
>I run at only 1 right now.
>
>  
>
>>Rod
>>
>>
>>Ugo Bellavance wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>>-----Message d'origine-----
>>>>De : Rodney Green [mailto:rgreen at TRAYERPRODUCTS.COM] 
>>>>Envoyé : 8 avril, 2004 14:25
>>>>À : MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>>>>Objet : Re: spamassassin - deferred mail
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I should also note that I'm using ClamAV for virus scanning.
>>>>
>>>>Rodney Green wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>MailScanner-4.23-11
>>>>>Postfix 2.0.15
>>>>>Red Hat 9
>>>>>
>>>>>Hello. When I have spam assassin enabled in MailScanner the 
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>mail gets
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>stuck in the /var/spool/postfix.in/deferred queue for a 
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>long while and
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>is finally delivered. What can I do to get this to deliver the mail
>>>>>faster?
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>Spamassassin add a lot to the amount of RAM used.  You 
>>>      
>>>
>>probably start swapping.
>>    
>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>Rod
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional."
>>>>
>>>>-Mad Scientist
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>

-- 
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." 

-Mad Scientist