spamassassin - deferred mail
Ugo Bellavance
ugob at CAMO-ROUTE.COM
Thu Apr 8 19:45:02 IST 2004
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Rodney Green [mailto:rgreen at TRAYERPRODUCTS.COM]
> Envoyé : 8 avril, 2004 14:39
> À : MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Objet : Re: RE : spamassassin - deferred mail
>
>
> Thanks Ugo. This machine does only have 128mb of RAM. I put
> in a request
> a couple of weeks ago for purchasing more memory for it.
> Hopefully we'll
> get it soon.
If you have a low volume, lower your max child processes.
I run at only 1 right now.
>
> Rod
>
>
> Ugo Bellavance wrote:
>
> >>-----Message d'origine-----
> >>De : Rodney Green [mailto:rgreen at TRAYERPRODUCTS.COM]
> >>Envoyé : 8 avril, 2004 14:25
> >>À : MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> >>Objet : Re: spamassassin - deferred mail
> >>
> >>
> >>I should also note that I'm using ClamAV for virus scanning.
> >>
> >>Rodney Green wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>MailScanner-4.23-11
> >>>Postfix 2.0.15
> >>>Red Hat 9
> >>>
> >>>Hello. When I have spam assassin enabled in MailScanner the
> >>>
> >>>
> >>mail gets
> >>
> >>
> >>>stuck in the /var/spool/postfix.in/deferred queue for a
> >>>
> >>>
> >>long while and
> >>
> >>
> >>>is finally delivered. What can I do to get this to deliver the mail
> >>>faster?
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >Spamassassin add a lot to the amount of RAM used. You
> probably start swapping.
> >
> >
> >
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>Rod
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>--
> >>"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional."
> >>
> >>-Mad Scientist
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list