spamassassin - deferred mail

Ugo Bellavance ugob at CAMO-ROUTE.COM
Thu Apr 8 19:45:02 IST 2004


> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Rodney Green [mailto:rgreen at TRAYERPRODUCTS.COM] 
> Envoyé : 8 avril, 2004 14:39
> À : MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Objet : Re: RE : spamassassin - deferred mail
> 
> 
> Thanks Ugo. This machine does only have 128mb of RAM. I put 
> in a request 
> a couple of weeks ago for purchasing more memory for it. 
> Hopefully we'll 
> get it soon.

If you have a low volume, lower your max child processes.

I run at only 1 right now.

> 
> Rod
> 
> 
> Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> 
> >>-----Message d'origine-----
> >>De : Rodney Green [mailto:rgreen at TRAYERPRODUCTS.COM] 
> >>Envoyé : 8 avril, 2004 14:25
> >>À : MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> >>Objet : Re: spamassassin - deferred mail
> >>
> >>
> >>I should also note that I'm using ClamAV for virus scanning.
> >>
> >>Rodney Green wrote:
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>MailScanner-4.23-11
> >>>Postfix 2.0.15
> >>>Red Hat 9
> >>>
> >>>Hello. When I have spam assassin enabled in MailScanner the 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>mail gets
> >>    
> >>
> >>>stuck in the /var/spool/postfix.in/deferred queue for a 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>long while and
> >>    
> >>
> >>>is finally delivered. What can I do to get this to deliver the mail
> >>>faster?
> >>>      
> >>>
> >
> >Spamassassin add a lot to the amount of RAM used.  You 
> probably start swapping.
> >
> >  
> >
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>Rod
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>--
> >>"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional."
> >>
> >>-Mad Scientist
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >  
> >
> 




More information about the MailScanner mailing list