Order of spam and virus tags important?

[Ron Hahn (Senior Analyst)]

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Field [mailto:mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK]
Sent: 05 April 2004 16:30
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Order of spam and virus tags important?


Is it going to upset anyone if, on infected messages, I always put the
{Spam?} tag before the {Virus?} tag?

That way around, it is easier to automatically filter all spam messages,
whether infected or not, with a rule that says "subject starts with
{Spam?}".


-> I use ^\{Spam in my ruleset.  I would prefer the spam tag to start the
subject line.

Ron


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses , using the latest available virus signatures .


**********************************************************************