Fwd: RE: Dealing with MailScanner overloads

[Raymond Dijkxhoorn]

Hi!

> > I would probably implement it as a Custom Function, as it's a side issue
> > from the main point of scanning messages.
>
> Yes, you would need to restart sendmail after changing the access table, but
> we use a Postgresql Backend for all of our sendmail tables so we have gotten
> past that issue.

No you dont. Access is directly active it you make the DB.

Bye,
Raymond.