Fwd: RE: Dealing with MailScanner overloads

[Errol Neal]

Quoting Julian Field <mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>:

> What do you all think of this suggestion? Any ideas for improvements or
> useful ways to implement it?
>
> 'm thinking along the lines of adding entries to the sendmail access db. I
> can't remember if I need to restart sendmail after changing the access db,
> but a way of avoiding having to do that would be good.
>
> I would probably implement it as a Custom Function, as it's a side issue
> from the main point of scanning messages.

Yes, you would need to restart sendmail after changing the access table, but
we use a Postgresql Backend for all of our sendmail tables so we have gotten
past that issue.

Regards,

Errol Neal



-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/