RBL

[Kevin Spicer]

On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 11:05, David While wrote:

>My plan was that the IP address would have to be reported by more than
>one client before it got added.

You could perhaps also return different data (172.0.0.1, 172.0.0.2 etc.)
depending on how many clients report it, or how many hits on it the
reporting clients have - this would allow users of the RBL to make their
own judgements about when a sender should be blacklited.  Over time a
sender with no more reports could drop back down the scale, where the
more conservative clients will then start to detect and report it again,
pushing it back up.

Actually thats just got really complicated!  Maybe for the future?





BMRB International
http://www.bmrb.co.uk
+44 (0)20 8566 5000
_________________________________________________________________
This message (and any attachment) is intended only for the
recipient and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  If you have received this in error, please contact the
sender and delete this message immediately.  Disclosure, copying
or other action taken in respect of this email or in
reliance on it is prohibited.  BMRB International Limited
accepts no liability in relation to any personal emails, or
content of any email which does not directly relate to our
business.