Any significant changes to the Spamassassin interaction code? (Alpha runs Mailscanner buggily now)

[David Höhn]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Julian Field wrote:

| At 11:21 24/11/2003, you wrote:
|
|> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|> Hash: RIPEMD160
|>
|> Julian Field wrote:
|>
|> | There have been a few subtle changes, yes.
|> | I plan to produce a new version this weekend, so I would hold off
|> upgrading
|> | for a week...
|> |
|> Very strange indeed. Would they influence Mail processing ina  way that
|> the load climbs up to 20 and higher?
|
|
| Real load, or merely adding to the value reported by uptime/top?
|
very real load. Something seems to be chewing memory as well. I do see
that the MailScanner processes are consuming more CPU for more period of
time than they used to. I will galdly supply any output you need.

- -d

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/wgFviW/Ta/pxHPQRA0acAJ9ATs4rknxNTodMdGtaRez1TY1O8gCg0KMq
OD2pNLv/6Dn2VsCOHECy28E=
=/tiM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----