Any significant changes to the Spamassassin interaction code? (Alpha runs Mailscanner buggily now)
dh at UPTIME.AT
Mon Nov 24 13:02:39 GMT 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Julian Field wrote:
| At 11:21 24/11/2003, you wrote:
|> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|> Hash: RIPEMD160
|> Julian Field wrote:
|> | There have been a few subtle changes, yes.
|> | I plan to produce a new version this weekend, so I would hold off
|> | for a week...
|> Very strange indeed. Would they influence Mail processing ina way that
|> the load climbs up to 20 and higher?
| Real load, or merely adding to the value reported by uptime/top?
very real load. Something seems to be chewing memory as well. I do see
that the MailScanner processes are consuming more CPU for more period of
time than they used to. I will galdly supply any output you need.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the MailScanner