"Dangerous Content" or "Banned Content"?

[Timothy VanFosson]

How about {Content Policy Violation}?  The word "banned" carries with it
some emotional baggage, at least in the US, that I'd like to avoid.

tv

At 11:33 AM 11/19/2003, you wrote:
>I'm thinking of changing one of the default subject line tags for new
>installations.
>It currently says
>        {Dangerous Content?}
>but I'm thinking of changing it to
>        {Banned Content}
>
>My thinking is that the content checks, such as HTML tags, partial
>messages, attachment size limits and so on are more of a policy/safety
>issue than a risk issue. What is considered safe on a site is really a
>policy decision made by the management of that site.
>
>Having messages which are too big tagged as potentially dangerous isn't
>really correct.
>
>Does that sound reasonable?
>--
>Julian Field
>www.MailScanner.info
>Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
>PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC  7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654

--
Timothy VanFosson, Manager         E-mail: timv at ccad.uiowa.edu
Computing Services, Web Master    WWW: http://www.ccad.uiowa.edu/~timv/
Center for Computer-Aided Design   US Mail: The University of Iowa
Phone: (319) 335-6298                      208 ERF
FAX: (319) 384-0542                        Iowa City, Iowa 52242

What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, yet forfeit
his soul? Or what can a man give in exchange for his soul?