"Dangerous Content" or "Banned Content"?

[Martin Hepworth]

Julian

sounds good - any chance of it being user configurable (well part of the
config file anyhow)?

Julian Field wrote:
> I'm thinking of changing one of the default subject line tags for new
> installations.
> It currently says
>        {Dangerous Content?}
> but I'm thinking of changing it to
>        {Banned Content}
>
> My thinking is that the content checks, such as HTML tags, partial
> messages, attachment size limits and so on are more of a policy/safety
> issue than a risk issue. What is considered safe on a site is really a
> policy decision made by the management of that site.
>
> Having messages which are too big tagged as potentially dangerous isn't
> really correct.
>
> Does that sound reasonable?
> --
> Julian Field
> www.MailScanner.info
> Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
> PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC  7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654


--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300


**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.

**********************************************************************