Dual TO: names in Mailwatch

Tue Nov 11 00:25:36 GMT 2003

I meant TO...sorry...

CT

-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On
Behalf Of Steve Freegard
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 5:52 PM
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: Dual TO: names in Mailwatch

Chris,

The subject of this thread said that it was duplicationg the TO address
not
the FROM address...

If the from address is the duplicate and not the to address, then edit
the
file I sent you and where it is commented about the Postfix problems,
change
all occurrences of @{$message->{to}} to @{$message->{from}} and restart
MailScanner.

Regards,
Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Trudeau <chris at TRUDEAU.ORG>
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Sent: Mon Nov 10 22:44:32 2003
Subject: Re: Dual TO: names in Mailwatch

All I did was replace the SQL logging portions of this file and replaced
the
production /usr/lib/MailScanner/MailScanner/MailWatch.pm with the
attached...

Still allows flawless SQL logging, but doesn't solve the replication of
FROM
address entries in the database.

CT

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Freegard" <steve.freegard at LBSLTD.CO.UK>
To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: Dual TO: names in Mailwatch

>
> Chris,
>
> Please try the attached replacement MailWatch.pm.
>
> Let me know how you get on.
>
> Kind regards,
> Steve.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Trudeau
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Sent: 11/10/03 9:56 PM
> Subject: Re: Dual TO: names in Mailwatch
>
> tried both actually...neither adversely affect the operation of the
> system
> or the logging, but neither resolve the dual logging problem.
>
> CT
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Julian Field" <mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
> To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 4:40 PM
> Subject: Re: Dual TO: names in Mailwatch
>
>
> > At 21:27 10/11/2003, you wrote:
> > >Steve,
> > >I added these lines in my MailWatch.pm as outlined below:
> > >
> > ><SNIP>
> > >use DBI;
> > >use Sys::Hostname;
> > >
> > >my($dbh);
> > >my($sth);
> > >my($hostname) = hostname;
> > >my(%rcpts);
> > >map { $rcpts{$_}=1; } @{$message->{to}};
> > >@{$message->{to}} = keys %rcpts;
> > >
> > ># Modify this as necessary for your configuration
> > >my($db_name) = "mailscanner";
> > ></SNIP>
> > >
> > >
> > >Restarted processes.  no errors in SQL logging, but still receiving
> > >duplicates...
> >
> > You need to add it near the top of the MailWatch subroutine, not at
> the
> top
> > of the file.
> >
> >
> > >This isn't exactly a pristine environment though...let me re-build
my
> test
> > >box and try it there...I'll let you know.
> > >
> > >THX
> > >CT
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Steve Freegard" <steve.freegard at LBSLTD.CO.UK>
> > >To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> > >Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:42 AM
> > >Subject: Re: Dual TO: names in Mailwatch
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi Julian,
> > > >
> > > > I had to change:
> > > >
> > > > $message->{to} = keys %rcpts;
> > > >  to
> > > > @{$message->{to}} = keys %rcpts;
> > > >
> > > > Otherwise $message->{to} was always blank - seems to work okay
> with
> > > > Sendmail, just need someone to test it with Postfix.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Steve.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Julian Field
> > > > To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > > > Sent: 11/10/03 3:35 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Dual TO: names in Mailwatch
> > > >
> > > > Steve,
> > > >
> > > > Can this be done easily in MailWatch by doing something like
this
> very
> > > > early on with the message?
> > > >
> > > > my(%rcpts);
> > > > map { $rcpts{$_}=1; } @{$message->{to}};
> > > > $message->{to} = keys %rcpts;
> > > >
> > > > That would remove any duplicate "to" addresses from the message
> object.
> > > > Try putting the above 3 lines of code right near the start of
the
> > > > MailWatch
> > > > code.
> > > >
> > > > At 15:25 10/11/2003, you wrote:
> > > > >I tried to respond off list to Julian, but my mail was
returned.
> > > > >
> > > > >I've been begging for this for months and would entertain the
> idea of
> > > > paying
> > > > >someone (anyone) to escalate the priority of this problem...
> > > > >
> > > > >Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > >CT
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > >From: "Julian Field" <mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
> > > > >To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> > > > >Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 9:03 AM
> > > > >Subject: Re: Dual TO: names in Mailwatch
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > It's a known MailScanner bug. I just haven't got around to
> fixing
> it
> > > > yet,
> > > > > > it's not exactly high priority at the moment.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At 13:59 10/11/2003, you wrote:
> > > > > > >Hi Pete,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >This is a MailScanner or Postfix issue as MailWatch only
uses
> > > > information
> > > > > > >from MailScanner's $message object which is populated by
> > > > MailScanner
> > > > > > >parseing the Postfix message file.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >You'll also find the same problem of duplicated 'To'
entries
> in
> the
> > > > admin
> > > > > > >notices as reported by someone else.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >The postcat command didn't really give me much to go on at
> all
> > > > (thought
> > > > >it'd
> > > > > > >be better than that) - so I'll have a Google around and see
> if I
> > > > can find
> > > > > > >any info about the file spec for Postfix and see if I can
> find
> the
> > > > >problem.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Regards,
> > > > > > >Steve.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > > > >From: Pete russell <pete at EATATHOME.COM.AU>
> > > > > > >To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> > > > > > >Sent: Mon Nov 10 13:47:28 2003
> > > > > > >Subject: Re: Dual TO: names in Mailwatch
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Funny, this happened ona %100 fresh install of mailscanner
> and
> > > > fedora
> > > > > > >and MW .4 - my previous post was regarding my existing MW
.3
> > > > machines.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >If you do find a fault I can repair myself, please le tme
> know as
> I
> > > > > > >would like to fix the .3 install on the production servers
-
> cos
> I
> > > > wont
> > > > > > >be moving to .4 just yet.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >thanks
> > > > > > >Pete
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > > > >From: MailScanner mailing list
> [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK]
> > > > On
> > > > > > >Behalf Of Steve Freegard
> > > > > > >Sent: Tuesday, 11 November 2003 12:37 AM
> > > > > > >To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > > > > > >Subject: Re: Dual TO: names in Mailwatch
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Hi Pete,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Can you stop the outbound queue runner temporarily to stop
> the
> > > > messages
> > > > > > >that
> > > > > > >have been processed by MailScanner from being delievered,
> then
> run
> > > > the
> > > > > > >'postcat' command across one of the messages and post the
> output
> to
> > > > the
> > > > > > >list.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Kind regards,
> > > > > > >Steve.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > > > >From: Pete russell <pete at EATATHOME.COM.AU>
> > > > > > >To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> > > > > > >Sent: Mon Nov 10 08:38:36 2003
> > > > > > >Subject: Dual TO: names in Mailwatch
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >I have the latest version of mailwatch, mailscanner,
postfix,
> mysql
> > > > and
> > > > > > >RH9 - in the TO: column, when looking at recent messages,
all
> the
> > > > names
> > > > > > >are listed twice - this also makes the Top Recipients by
> Volume
> > > > graph
> > > > > > >unreadable as the legend has 2 entries for each person.
> Doesn't
> > > > seem
> > > > > > >like we are getting 2 deliveries though, and doesn't seem
> like
> > > > anything
> > > > > > >is written twice to the maillog.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Any ideas?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Pete
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >--
> > > > > > >This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential
> and
> > > > > > >intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
> whom
> > > > they
> > > > > > >are addressed. If you have received this email in error
> please
> > > > notify
> > > > > > >the sender and delete the message from your mailbox.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >This footnote also confirms that this email message has
been
> swept
> > > > by
> > > > > > >MailScanner (www.mailscanner.info) for the presence of
> computer
> > > > viruses.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >--
> > > > > > >This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential
> and
> > > > > > >intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
> whom
> > > > they
> > > > > > >are addressed. If you have received this email in error
> please
> > > > notify
> > > > > > >the sender and delete the message from your mailbox.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >This footnote also confirms that this email message has
been
> swept
> > > > by
> > > > > > >MailScanner (www.mailscanner.info) for the presence of
> computer
> > > > viruses.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Julian Field
> > > > > > www.MailScanner.info
> > > > > > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC  7222 11F6 5947 1415
> B654
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Julian Field
> > > > www.MailScanner.info
> > > > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
> > > >
> > > > PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC  7222 11F6 5947 1415
B654
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and
> > > > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
> they
> > > > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
> notify
> > > > the sender and delete the message from your mailbox.
> > > >
> > > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been
swept
> by
> > > > MailScanner (www.mailscanner.info) for the presence of computer
> viruses.
> >
> > --
> > Julian Field
> > www.MailScanner.info
> > Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
> > MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
> > PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC  7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
>
>
> --
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the sender and delete the message from your mailbox.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> MailScanner (www.mailscanner.info) for the presence of computer
viruses.
>
>

--
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the sender and delete the message from your mailbox.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MailScanner (www.mailscanner.info) for the presence of computer viruses.