ANNOUNCE: MailWatch for MailScanner 0.4

[Pete russell]

Excellent, thanks. Bit of a trade off, will have to think about it -
pretty happy with 3B at the minute, so will throw .4 at the test machine
tomorrow and go from there.

Thanks

BTW MailWatch really is fantastic (I am sure you already know), it
really makes mailscanner for us, not being linux gurus, its nice to be
able to see whats happening clearly, with pictures :) KMuch appreciated
from here - thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On
Behalf Of Steve Freegard
Sent: Monday, 10 November 2003 10:20 PM
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: MailWatch for MailScanner 0.4

Hi Pete,

Logging to the 2nd machine would save you some cycles on the 1st machine
as
you wouldn't need to run the MySQL server, Apache or PHP on it.

However you won't be able to use the Quarantine facilities as the
DISTRIBUTED_SETUP mode disables it as it can only work with local files
at
present.

The UPGRADING file in root dir of the tarball containg the upgrade
procedure
for both 0.3beta and 0.2.

Kind regards,
Steve.


-----Original Message-----
From: Pete russell <pete at EATATHOME.COM.AU>
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Sent: Mon Nov 10 11:08:03 2003
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: MailWatch for MailScanner 0.4

In regards to distributed - I have 2 very old and slow machine handling
the load for my 2 domains - the load is split over them using MX
records.

Each machine currently has its own MYSQL and Mailwatch install.

Currently the 2nd machine gets almost no traffic, we are smallish site
and the 1st server handles the load fine so far.

If I placed used the 2nd machine to handle all the mailwatch stuff,
would I be placing an extra load on the 1st machine, by asking it to log
to sql on the 2nd machine - is there an extra load logging this
remotely, as oppose to locally?

I am using heaps of RAM already, but CPU still seems to have plenty of
room left for some more load.

I cant find any upgrade doco from .3 to .4 ?

Thanks
Pete

-----Original Message-----
From: MailScanner mailing list [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On
Behalf Of Martin Hepworth
Sent: Monday, 10 November 2003 9:58 PM
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: MailWatch for MailScanner 0.4

Steve

any update on the upgrade info. The file talks about 0.2 to 0.3. Is
there anything to be done for a 0.3beta to 0.4?


--
Martin Hepworth
Senior Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic Ltd
tel: +44 (0)1865 842300


Steve Freegard wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I'm pleased to annouce that MailWatch for MailScanner 0.4 is now
available
> for download for Sourceforge.
>
> Main changes:
>
> * Major interface speed-ups.
> * New DISTRIBUTED_MODE for those running MailWatch in a cluster
(thanks to
> Stijn Jonker for this).
> * New tool for Sendmail users that reads the maillog for relay entries
and
> records them for display on the Message Detail page (thanks to Chris
> Campbell for the idea).
> * Load average is displayed on the page headers on systems where
> /proc/load_avg is available.
> * The 'Message Listing' report now uses a Google-style pager.
> * Fix for Exim users where $message->{clientip} is stored as
> ip.ip.ip.ip.port.
> * Plus a load of bugfixes and tidy-ups.
>
> You can view the full changelog, view the screenshots and download it
on the
> MailWatch webpage: http://mailwatch.sourceforge.net
>
> Kind regards,
> Steve.
>
> --
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the sender and delete the message from your mailbox.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> MailScanner (www.mailscanner.info) for the presence of computer
viruses.




**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.

**********************************************************************

--
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the sender and delete the message from your mailbox.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MailScanner (www.mailscanner.info) for the presence of computer viruses.