Mistake in MailScanner.conf ?
Kevin Spicer
kevins at BMRB.CO.UK
Sun Nov 9 19:29:20 GMT 2003
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 18:20, Julian Field wrote: At 17:37 09/11/2003,
>I *think* what happens (would have to study the source to prove it) is
>this:
>Allow Convert Actions
>Yes Yes/No None
>Disarm No Disarm affected tags
>Disarm Yes Stripped
>No Yes Stripped
>No No Blocked
So, the behavior has changed then....? Previously setting No for the
allow actions blocked the mail completely.
Anyway, I'm seeing odd behavior with this on the latest snapshot. I was
previously using a ruleset for the Allow... options like this.
From: /^172\.1[6789]\./ no
From: /^172\.2[0123456789]\./ no
From: /^172\.3[01]\./ no
From: 192.168. no
From: default yes
(The RE's match the private address ranges which we use internally)
And I had Convert Dangerous... set to yes
This produced the following behaviour...
Incoming offending mail: stripped (so our users still get the mail)
Outgoing offending mail: returned to sender (so we don't send out stuff
other sites will strip)
I just installed the latest beta and just changed the last line of the
ruleset to...
From: default disarm
(I left all other settings as they were.)
But I'm seeing incoming offending mail is now blocked. Any idea why?
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list