Spam notice

Julian Field mailscanner at
Sat Nov 8 13:00:57 GMT 2003

How about someone sets up an area in the FAQ to contain links to all the
"utility" sites, say 1 page per utility so the maintainers can each do
their own page.

At 20:54 07/11/2003, you wrote:
>My thoughts exactly! Keep MS clean and we can build all kinds of
>utilities around it instead. Don't bloat the core.
>I have written shell scripts for cleaning the quarantine, moving
>quarantined mails to the outgoing queue (with preview of
>to/from/date/subject), simple stats and so on. Maybe we could share
>links to our utilities instead to help each other? Kind of like the FAQ.
>/Peter Bonivart
>--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
>Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.23-11,
>SpamAssassin 2.60 + DCC 1.2.9, ClamAV 20030829
>Julian Field wrote:
>>Sorry to pass the buck on this one, but would this be better implemented
>>in MailWatch? It's an archiving and log analysis problem, not a mail
>>scanning problem.
>>Steve -- what do you think?E

Julian Field
Professional Support Services at
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC  7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654

More information about the MailScanner mailing list