Spam notice

[Ugo Bellavance]

> > > Problem with digests, as experienced in the past with web 
> hosting and
> > > setting up Email mailing lists, is that HTML Emails cause a lot of
> > > headaches. The digest mode would have to strip HTML or save it as
> > > text/plain - otherwise badly-written HTML could make an
> > > archive really hard
> > > to read, if readable at all, embedded styles, etc., could
> > > make even the
> > > prettiest HTML documents look horrendous.
> > >
> > > Just my $0.02 worth, but yes, I support this idea. I have one
> > > user (who gets
> > > 50% of all spam collected on my system of dozens of domains
> > > hosted) who is
> > > particularly paranoid about FP's and losing legit Email.
> > >
> > > -id
> >
> >To me, a plain-text digest containing info about the message 
> would be 
> >sufficient.
> >Example:
> >
> >You received 3 messages that were considered as Spam by 
> MailScanner and 
> >quarantined, here is the list:
> >
> >Message 1:
> >
> >From:
> >To:
> >Subject:
> >Spam score:
> >Time/Date:
> >To have this message released from quarantine, send this 
> info to your Mail 
> >Admin:
> >/path/to/message
> >
> >So on..
> >
> >Any other ideas?
> 
> Sorry to pass the buck on this one, but would this be better 
> implemented in 
> MailWatch?

I've searched on MailWatch, but I only found commercial products or windows products.  Is that the thing?

Thanks,

Ugo

> It's an archiving and log analysis problem, not a 
> mail scanning 
> problem.
> Steve -- what do you think?E
> -- 
> Julian Field
> www.MailScanner.info
> Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
> PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC  7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
>