Rejected posting to MAILSCANNER@JISCMAIL.AC.UK

[Ulysees]

looks like somethings going wrong somewhere, I only sent the message once.
Had a trawl through the headers though and spotted that it appears to be
going to someone hosted by tls & that it's trying to repost them.
I know you're probably up to your eyes but it'd be nice if you could
identify who it was and stop em.

course you could also just be really mean and start blacklisting hosts :)

Uly

Return-Path: <root at mail3.tls.net>
Received: from 130.246.192.52 by JISCMAIL.AC.UK (SMTPL release 1.0i) with
TCP; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 19:37:40 GMT
Received: from mail3.tls.net (mail3.tls.net [65.196.224.15] (may be forged))
 by ori.rl.ac.uk (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id hA6Jbdr12895
 for <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>; Thu, 6 Nov 2003 19:37:39 GMT
Received: (qmail 20487 invoked by uid 0); 6 Nov 2003 19:37:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 7276 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2003 12:32:24 -0000
Received: from mailspool.tls.net (208.252.191.4)
  by 0 with SMTP; 5 Nov 2003 12:32:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 1071 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2003 10:42:47 -0000
Received: from smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk (130.246.192.48)
  by 0 with SMTP; 5 Nov 2003 10:42:47 -0000
Received: from LISTSERV.JISCMAIL.AC.UK (jiscmail.ac.uk) by
smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id
<4.0008DA17 at smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk>;
*snip*




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "L-Soft list server at JISCMAIL (1.8e)" <LISTSERV at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
To: "No Name Available" <Ulysees at ULYSEES.COM>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 7:37 PM
Subject: Rejected posting to MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK


> Your message  is being returned to  you unprocessed because it  appears to
have
> already  been distributed  to the  MAILSCANNER list.  That is,  a message
with
> identical text  (but possibly with different  mail headers) has been
posted to
> the list recently, either by you or by  someone else. If you have a good
reason
> to resend this message to the list (for instance because you have been
notified
> of a hardware failure with loss of  data), please alter the text of the
message
> in some way and  resend it to the list. Note that  altering the "Subject:"
line
> or adding blank  lines at the top  or bottom of the message  is not
sufficient;
> you should  instead add a  sentence or  two at the  top explaining why
you are
> resending the  message, so that the  other subscribers understand why
they are
> getting two copies of the same message.
>
>