spam score for each test in header

[Stephen Swaney]

The short answer is The firm only uses Outlook. Perhaps encapulation
could be an option that could be enabled if all the users had
message/rfc822 complaint browsers.

Steve

Steve Swaney
Steve at Swaney.com

On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 09:30, John Wilcock wrote:

> On Fri, 16 May 2003 14:17:29 +0100, Julian Field wrote:
> > Anyone know what
> >          mutt
> >          pine
> >          Eudora
> >          Outlook Express
> >          Outlook
> > do when given an rfc822 containing lots of parts?
> 
> Outlook (2000 or 2002, don't know about earlier versions) do the right
> thing, i.e. show the rfc822 as an attachment which you can then open
> exactly as if it were a normal message, regardless of what parts it
> has. 
> 
> OTOH, Eudora 4.x doesn't understand message/rfc822 at all.
> No idea about Eudora 5.x nor any of the others you mention. 
> 
> FWIW, Forté Agent also handles message/rfc822 properly, and indeed its
> "Forward Verbatim" option generates precisely this structure.
> 
> 
> John.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20030516/2e6712b4/attachment.html