SV: DNSBLs

[Anders Andersson, IT]

Do you mean you have removed the lines from sendmail?
I started just using the MS/SA RBL's but realized I didnt even wanted those
mail to enter my system. So I added 3 RBL's to sendmail and stop about 90%
before even entering my system. The rest we still use MS/SA to catch.....
might be good might be bad but sofar noone complained  =) 

> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: Richard Alexander [mailto:copper_shotgun at HOTMAIL.COM] 
> Skickat: den 13 maj 2003 16:43
> Till: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Ämne: DNSBLs
> 
> 
> Since setting up MailScanner and SA on our new Red Hat 9 
> server, we have noticed and increase in SPAM messages.  
> MailScanner is tagging the files correctly, but I'm not sure 
> that have the DNSBL setup correctly in mailscanner.conf.  
> Before MS i had the following line setup in sendmail.mc and 
> it seemed to do a pretty good job of catching the obvious:
> 
> FEATURE(`dnsbl', `list.dsbl.org', `"Email blocked using 
> ORDB.org - see <http://ORDB.org/lookup/?> host="$&{client_addr}">"')dnl
> 
> This is the current setup in MailScanner.conf:
> 
>  This is the list of spam blacklists (RBLs) which you are 
> using. # See the "Spam List Definitions" file for more 
> information about what # you can put here. # This can also be 
> the filename of a ruleset. Spam List = DSBL ORDB-RBL 
> Infinite-Monkeys # MAPS-RBL+ costs money (except .ac.uk)
> 
> # This is the list of spam domain blacklists which you are 
> using # (such as the "rfc-ignorant" domains). See the "Spam 
> List Definitions" # file for more information about what you 
> can put here. # This can also be the filename of a ruleset. # 
> Spam Domain List =
> 
> # If an individual "Spam List" or "Spam Domain List" check 
> takes longer # that this (in seconds), the check is abandoned 
> and the timeout noted. Spam List Timeout = 10
>