Broken message - Was Re: spamassassin 2.53 & MailScanner

[Julian Field]

At 15:02 09/05/2003, you wrote:
>>Return-Path: <owner-mailscanner at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
>>Received: from redbudcm1a.cats.ohiou.edu (redbudcm1a.cats.ohiou.edu
>>[132.235.8.34])         by oak2a.cats.ohiou.edu (8.12.8-OU/8.12.8-OU)
>>with ESMTP
>>id h49DbkhP1222050      for <adkinss at oak.cats.ohiou.edu>; Fri, 9 May 2003
>>09:37:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from root at localhost)
>>         by redbudcm1a.cats.ohiou.edu (8.12.8-OU/8.12.8-OU) with X.500 id
>>h49DbkaH831875  for adkinss at oak.cats.ohiou.edu; Fri, 9 May 2003 09:37:46
>>-0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk (smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk
>>[130.246.192.48])       by redbudcm1a.cats.ohiou.edu (8.12.8-OU/8.12.8-OU)
>>with ESMTP id h49DbjnN836610    for <adkinss at OHIO.EDU>; Fri, 9 May 2003
>>09:37:46 -0400 (EDT)
>>Received: from LISTSERV.JISCMAIL.AC.UK (jiscmail.ac.uk) by
>>smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id
>><7.0002933C at smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk>; Fri, 9 May 2003 14:37:43 +0100
>>Received: from JISCMAIL.AC.UK by JISCMAIL.AC.UK (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release
>>1.8e)           with spool id 21705558 for MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK;
>>Fri, 9 May           2003 14:37:42 +0100
>>Received: from 130.246.192.52 by JISCMAIL.AC.UK (SMTPL release 1.0i) with
>>TCP;           Fri, 9 May 2003 14:37:42 +0100
>>X-RAL-MFrom: <adkinss at ohio.edu>
>>X-RAL-Connect: <oak.cats.ohiou.edu [132.235.8.44]>
>>Received: from oak1a.cats.ohiou.edu (oak.cats.ohiou.edu [132.235.8.44]) by
>>           ori.rl.ac.uk (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h49DbdS32395 for
>>           <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>; Fri, 9 May 2003 14:37:40 +0100
>>Received: from Callisto (callisto.cns.ohiou.edu [132.235.197.32]) by
>>           oak2a.cats.ohiou.edu (8.12.8-OU/8.12.8-OU) with ESMTP id
>>           h49DSOhP1227260 for <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>; Fri, 9 May
>>2003           09:28:24 -0400 (EDT)
>>References:
>><5C0296D26910694BB9A9BBFC577E7AB0011752B6 at pascal.priv.bmrb.co.uk>
>>Message-ID:  <1278472075.1052472506 at Callisto>
>>Date:         Fri, 9 May 2003 09:28:26 -0400
>>Reply-To: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
>>Sender: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
>>From: Scott Adkins <adkinss at OHIO.EDU>
>>Subject: Re: spamassassin 2.53 & MailScanner
>>To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>>In-Reply-To:  <5.2.0.9.2.20030509083619.03497038 at imap.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
>>Precedence: list
>>X-MailScanner-VirusCheck: Found to be clean
>>X-MailScanner-Information: http://www.cns.ohiou.edu/email/spam-virus.html
>>X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.5, required 5,
>>         IN_REP_TO, PGP_SIGNATURE, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,
>>         SPAM_PHRASE_03_05)
>>
>>  <5C0296D26910694BB9A9BBFC577E7AB0011752B6 at pascal.priv.bmrb.co.uk>
>>  <5.2.0.9.2.20030509083619.03497038 at imap.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
>>X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.3 (Win32)
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
>>  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
>>  boundary="==========1278479627=========="
>>
>>--==========1278479627==========
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>Content-Disposition: inline
>>
>>--On Friday, May 09, 2003 8:38 AM +0100 Julian Field=20
>><mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK> wrote:

MailScanner found the first blank line immediately after
         Precedence: list
and therefore took that as the end of the headers. Something else had
already screwed your headers by the time it got to MailScanner.
--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support