Bug in filename rules handling?

[Remco Barendse]

:)

Indeed in 4.14-1 the problem is fixed now, I get the warnings as they
should.

The other minor bug is still there tho. I have set Warning Is Attachment =
no in my MailScanner.conf and still this warning is an attachment.

Nothing serious but my users get scared if there's any vague report of
viruses and will not open any attachment, even the VirusWarning.txt :)

Thanks for fixing the problem!

Remco


On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Julian Field wrote:

> I'm not having a good day, am I? :)
>
> Yes, I meant the 4.14-1 URLs.
>
> At 11:38 11/03/2003, you wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> > > In the process of adding all the code to support proper checking of
> > > long/evil filenames, I screwed up.
> > >
> > > Please can you download and try out version 4.14-1, and let me know how you
> > > get on.
> > > URL's are
> > >
> > > Tar distribution:
> > >
> > http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/files/4/tar/MailScanner-4.13-3.tar
> >
> >I guess you mean:
> >
> >http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/files/4/tar/MailScanner-4.14-1.tar
> >
> > > RedHat (and others) RPM:
> > >
> > http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/files/4/rpm/MailScanner-4.13-3.rpm.tar
> >
> >http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/files/4/rpm/MailScanner-4.14-1.rpm.tar
> >
> > > SuSE:
> > >
> > http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/files/4/suse/MailScanner-4.13-3.suse.tar
> >
> >http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/files/4/suse/MailScanner-4.14-1.suse.tar
> >
> >Bye,
> >Raymond.
>
> --
> Julian Field
> www.MailScanner.info
> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
>
>


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.