More Spam on Backup MX Hosts

Derek Winkler dwinkler at ALGORITHMICS.COM
Wed Jun 18 21:52:13 IST 2003

All of mine are configured the same, was just wondering if it might be
worthwhile to put a rule in scoring emails on backup hosts a little higher.

-----Original Message-----
From: mikea [mailto:mikea at]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: More Spam on Backup MX Hosts

On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 03:41:25PM -0500, Mike Kercher wrote:
>'s a common tactic by a lot of Spamware to hit lower priority MX
> records first in hopes that they will be less secure than the primaries.

Much discussed on the SPAM-L list, and on a couple of private lists
dealing with spam and responses to it. One countermeasure is to put
your highest-priority MX host in as your lowest-priority MX as well.

I've been told that some RFC says this is a bad thing, but I haven't
been told _which_, and it does appear to work somewhat.

Eventually, of course, the spammers will pick MX hosts at random
from the list -- if they aren't doing it already.

Mike Andrews
mikea at
Tired old sysadmin since 1964
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

More information about the MailScanner mailing list