Change request - prohibited vs infected
Furnish, Trever G
TGFurnish at HERFF-JONES.COM
Thu Jul 24 22:45:33 IST 2003
Um, ditto. :-)
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul [mailto:zen23003 at ZEN.CO.UK]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:56 AM
>To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>Subject: Change request - prohibited vs infected
>
>
>Various file types are listed in filetype.rules.conf. The
>problem I have is
>that these files trigger a virus warning message when in fact these are
>simply prohibited file types. So too, the message header gets
>"X-MailScanner: Found to be infected" inserted into it.
>
>The same is true of prohibited file names (as specified in
>filename.rules.conf).
>
>What brought this to my attention was the default ban on movie files in
>filetype.rules.conf . These, unlike .pif, .scr and .exe etc are rarely
>infected.
>
>What I'd like to have is the ability to specify a different value for
>"X-MailScanner:" for prohibited file types and names, eg,
>"Prohibited file
>type" and "Prohibited file name".
>
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list