Message Size
Matthew Bowman
mbowman at UDCOM.COM
Thu Jul 3 20:01:30 IST 2003
I also think it would be a better idea to have more specific subjects
E.g. {SPAM? - FORM TAG}, {VIRUS? - REJECTED FILE TYPE), {VIRUS? - INFECTED
E-MAIL}
That sort of thing
Matthew
Alan Fiebig <mailscanner at ELKNET.NET>
Sent by: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
07/03/2003 03:53 PM
Please respond to MailScanner mailing list
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
cc:
Subject: Message Size
First, I don't want to sound ungrateful, I really do appreciate the new
feature to filter on total message size.
However, when a message is over the set size, MailScanner tags the subject
line with the {Virus} tag, and the report message to the receipient is the
virus removal message. Likewise, the report back to the sender appears to
be the 'Sender Error Report'.
These messages are a bit misleading. If the 'Maximum Message Size' filter
doesn't warrant having its own tag, report to receipient, and report to
sender, could you perhaps have that trigger use the 'Bad filename' report,
'Sender Bad Filename' report, and 'Filename Subject Text' tag instead?
Those make a bit more sense.
Thanks!
-Alan
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list