Version 4, Exim and header rewrites - patch required?

Ray Gardener R.A.Gardener at SHU.AC.UK
Wed Jan 22 10:48:49 GMT 2003


Hi Nick,

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Phillips" <nwp at LEMON-COMPUTING.COM>
To: <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: Version 4, Exim and header rewrites - patch required?


On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 05:47  am, Ray Gardener wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have examined the spool files produced by both version 3 and 4 of
> mailscanner and think that there may be a sight bug which is
> preventing the rewriting of certain header fields. Version 3 which
> works, specifies after the header length of these fields a character
> (F in the From: header, T in the To: header). Version 4 leaves out
> these letters. The exim specification suggest that these letters
> should be there and inserting them in files produced by version 4 and
> forcing delivery gives me mail with the headers rewritten perfectly.
>

>>Interesting. They certainly *should* be there. Do you find that they go
>>missing with all
>>messages, or only ones which have been modified in any particular way
>>i.e. that have
>>had spam headers added, or that have had content modified, or whatever)?

I originally did the test on just clean messages and we aren't currently
using the anti-spam stuff in mailscanner as I have that stuff configured in
Exim already. The only modification that should be done is the addition of
the mailscanner header indicating that the mail is clean. However I just
sent the eicar virus through and the headers in these  aren't being
rewritten also. It may be significant that this file has the (faulty) to:
header duplicated.

>Do you add signatures to clean messages?

no


Regards,

Ray Gardener
CIS
Sheffield Hallam University
Howard Street
Sheffield
UK
S1 1WB
(44)  0114 225 4926



More information about the MailScanner mailing list