clamav

[Dale Lovelace]

  No, I'm not particularly worried about catching virus, the Exchange guys are not getting rid of Anti-Gen, since it keeps users inside the office from sending virus to each other as well... I installed Clamav at first just to have the virus log messages for mailscanner-mrtg :-) I think I will keep it around now that I have it though, unless it breaks something...

  Dale

-----Original Message-----
From:   Julian Field [mailto:mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK]
Sent:   Thu 1/9/2003 3:42 AM
To:     MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Cc:	
Subject:        Re: clamav
Have you tried it with, perhaps, F-Prot or Sophos with a 30-day trial licence?

At 00:53 09/01/2003, you wrote:
>   I am running it at hotels.com scanning about 40,000 mails per day (is
> everyone's mail volume down since Christmas?). I haven't seen any
> problems with it, but it definitely doesn't catch everything. Our
> Exchange administrators run Anti-Gen on the Exchange servers which still
> catch as many virii as I do with Clamav, after going through the
> MailScanner server. I am simply using it to offload some of the work the
> Exchange servers do...
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:   Matthew Bowman [mailto:mbowman at UDCOM.COM]
>Sent:   Wed 1/8/2003 3:35 PM
>To:     MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>Cc:
>Subject:        clamav
>Hi
>
>Is anyone using clamav with their MailScanner installation - if so, how
>good is it? Is there any reason why I should not get it.
>
>I'm running:-
>
>Redhat 7.3
>sendmail 8.11.6-3
>MailScanner 4.10-1
>SpamAssassin 2.43
>
>Matthew K Bowman
>Systems Administrator; Hostmaster; Miva Administrator
>Universal Digital Communications, Mansfield Ohio.

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support