Pyzor

[Ugo Bellavance]

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Stephane Lentz [mailto:Stephane.Lentz at ANSF.ALCATEL.FR]
> Envoyé : Monday, December 29, 2003 5:18 PM
> À : MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Objet : Re: Pyzor
> 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 04:48:53PM -0500, Lindsay Snider wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 16:34, Matt wrote:
> > > Anyone using Pyzor with MailScanner?  Does it work very well?
> >
> > It works well for us.  Razor probably gives us the most 
> trouble in the
> > form of timeouts.
> > ...
> 
> Lindsay & other Pyzor users,
> 
> did you experience a lot of false positives ?

Hard to correlate false positives only with Pyzor, since the added score is low, but I guess not.

> I just did some small tests and it looks pretty reliable and uptodate.
> It seems however to suffer from some timeout from time to 
> time - less than
> Razor apparently.
> The default SA score for Pyzor checks seems way too low.
I don't think so.  Don't forget that people at spamassassin, who are specialists and have stats about each test, decided of that score.  The strenght of Spamassassin is not only one test, but the results of all the tests.

> Which one do you recommend ?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> SL/
>