RBL in MailScanner or Spamassassin?

[Ugo Bellavance]

Here is the FAQ http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/serve/cache/249.html

Comments welcome.

Ugo

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Ugo Bellavance 
> Envoyé : Thursday, December 18, 2003 6:18 PM
> À : MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Objet : Re: RBL in MailScanner or Spamassassin?
> 
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Peter Bonivart [mailto:peter at UCGBOOK.COM]
> > Envoyé : Thursday, December 18, 2003 5:41 PM
> > À : MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> > Objet : Re: RBL in MailScanner or Spamassassin?
> > 
> > 
> >  > Should I use both, or is SpamAssassin the better placee 
> to have it
> >  > turned on?
> > 
> > You should use just one, and remember that you can do it on your MTA
> > too. Earlier is less resource intensive but later is more 
> accurate. I
> > run mine in SA.
> > 
> 
> I also run them in SA only.  I've got too many false 
> positives using rbls in Mailscanner.  I think I'll write a 
> faq on this.
> 
> > /Peter Bonivart
> > 
> > --Unix lovers do it in the Sun
> > 
> > Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
> > SpamAssassin 2.61 + DCC 1.2.21, ClamAV 0.65 + GMP
> > 
>