RBL in MailScanner or Spamassassin?

[Ugo Bellavance]

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Peter Bonivart [mailto:peter at UCGBOOK.COM]
> Envoyé : Thursday, December 18, 2003 5:41 PM
> À : MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Objet : Re: RBL in MailScanner or Spamassassin?
> 
> 
>  > Should I use both, or is SpamAssassin the better placee to have it
>  > turned on?
> 
> You should use just one, and remember that you can do it on your MTA
> too. Earlier is less resource intensive but later is more accurate. I
> run mine in SA.
> 

I also run them in SA only.  I've got too many false positives using rbls in Mailscanner.  I think I'll write a faq on this.

> /Peter Bonivart
> 
> --Unix lovers do it in the Sun
> 
> Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
> SpamAssassin 2.61 + DCC 1.2.21, ClamAV 0.65 + GMP
>