Internet Explorer URL Display problem

[Daniel Bird]

Kevin Spicer wrote:

>On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 19:55, Antony Stone wrote:
>
>
>
>>Note by the way that the original notification referred to the %01
>>being
>>*after* the @ sign, not before it (before too many people go off and
>>concoct
>>various pattern matches for the wrong pattern!)
>>
>>
>
>Yes, but the proof of concept has the %01 before the @.  (I'm not sure
>which you were saying was wrong though).
>
>It is worth noting that since the %01 hides anything after it the @ need
>not follow immediately, for example
>
>www.amazon.com%01Iwantallyourmoney at www.evil.com
>
>
>
so how about the regexp:

\%01.+ at .+\

?



--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.