Postfix configuration/efficiency....

Pete pete at eatathome.com.au
Tue Dec 9 21:15:33 GMT 2003


Eric Sandquist wrote:

> Periodically I see reference to setting up MailScanner  with a single
> instance of Postfix, instead of the standard 2 Postfix install
> described in the instructions.
>
> Is there any advantage in doing this?  Memory savings? Server load? I
> need to maximize the efficiency of this machine...  Are there any
> instructions for this type of installation? or for converting from a
> working standard installation?  Are there any drawbacks to this type
> of installation?
>
> Currently, we are running Dual PIII 500, 512Megs Ram...   I've worked
> very hard to get the server load down to about 4....  It has been as
> high as 10...
>
> We are processing about 40,000 mails per day....
>
> I realize that the best soution is a more powerful machine than this,
> but the client company won't do it (until this one dies)....
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Eric Sandquist*
> *Systems Engineer*
> *ICQ#: 10274846*
> *Current ICQ status:*
>
> *+*  *More ways to contact me * <http://wwp.icq.com/10274846>
> www.ihms.net <http://www.ihms.net/>
> www.messianicgroups.com <http://www.messianicgroups.com/>
> www.nazarene.net <http://www.nazarene.net/>
> www.amazinggroups.com <http://www.amazinggroups.com/>
> www.613commandments.com <http://www.613commandments.com/>
> www.hebrew-roots.com <http://www.hebrew-roots.com/>
> www.netzarim.cc <http://www.netzarim.cc/>
> www.momsonthego.us <http://www.momsonthego.us/>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Home Business Opportunity!! <http://www.amazinggroups.cyberwize.com/>
> *- Travel, Taxes, Health, and More
>
>

I am no expert - but Julian has repeatedly posted he believes that
Sendmail and Exim are much faster than postfix when used with mailscanner.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list