how to set up an RBL
Antony Stone
Antony at SOFT-SOLUTIONS.CO.UK
Thu Aug 28 18:02:14 IST 2003
On Thursday 28 August 2003 5:46 pm, Furnish, Trever G wrote:
> I like the way spamcop seems to work - auto-remove a site after 2 days if
> it hasn't been resubmitted - but I'd prefer a longer timeout since many
> MTAs retry delivery for up to 5 days.
That actually sounds quite an advantageous combination to me.
If a site remains in the RBL because it genuinely belongs there, then emails
continue to be blocked.
If a site gets removed from the RBL because it no longer belongs in the list,
then currently queued legitimate emails will be successfully delivered.
I guess it all comes down to the criteria for including a site in the RBL,
and those for removing it - so long as those are sensible, then the above
combination of timings (ie mailserver timeout being longer than the
autoexpiry time for no-longer-needed entries in the RBL) seems to cause least
disruption to the delivery of valid email (which is most people's biggest
criticism of RBLs), IMHO.
Antony.
--
The first ninety percent of an engineering project takes ninety percent
of the time, and the last ten percent takes the remaining ninety percent.
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list