dangerous html warning

[Julian Field]

I need to test what I've written first, but I hope to get time for that 
either tonight (expecting minimum 70F tonight with no air-con) if I don't 
sleep, or tomorrow if I do.
I hope to get a beta-release out to you all tomorrow which will do what you 
want.

If you can tell me what you would like to see in the "deleted" and the 
"stored" reports, it would help me write them.

At 20:55 06/08/2003, you wrote:
>Le mer 06/08/2003 à 11:48, Julian Field a écrit :
> > At 15:18 06/08/2003, you wrote:
> > >On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:39:33 +0200, you wrote:
> > > >Same here, a lot of people send in mail like, your scanner sucks 
> since my
> > > >own scanner didnt find anything. They dont understand it was for example
> > > >a reject based on filename filters.
> > > >
> > > >Would it be possible to have a seperate identifier for that ?
> > > >Something like {?rejected} ?
> > >
> > >For filenames there is allready:
> >
> > Yay! Someone actually read the docs! This option has been in the conf file
> > for absolutely ages, just no-one ever uses it :)
>
>I've been using it from the beginning to differentiate between virus
>infected emails {VIRUS} and the potentially dangerous ones {VIRUS?}.
>
>BUT I would also like to be able to use a different message template for
>IFRAME and OBJECT CODEBASE because it confuses people the way it is now.
>
>I had to write (translated to English): if the output of the virus
>scanner below says virus found, then the attachment was infected;
>otherwise, the attachment was quarantined because it could cause damage
>to some users...
>
>People don't read the whole message and call/write us because they
>believe their computer is infected...
>
>Denis
>--
>Denis Beauchemin, analyste
>Université de Sherbrooke, S.T.I.
>T: 819.821.8000x2252 F: 819.821.8045

-- 
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support