Porn msg identification?

[Julian Field]

At 21:54 07/04/2003, you wrote:
>Julian,
>
>I hadn't thought of using that until now.
>
>Would the correct syntax be:-
>
>To:     default         striphtml deliver

If you want to use a ruleset, that's right. However if it is for all cases,
just set
Spam Actions = striphtml deliver
High Scoring Spam Actions = striphtml deliver


>?
>
>Regards, --
>Matthew K Bowman Systems Administrator, Universal Digital Communications.
>
>
>
>
>
>Julian Field <mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK>
>Sent by: MailScanner mailing list <MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
>04/07/2003 01:24 PM
>Please respond to MailScanner mailing list
>
>
>         To:     MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>         cc:
>         Subject:        Re: Porn msg identification?
>
>
>The problem of nasty porn spam can largely be solved with the "striphtml"
>spam action, as it removes all images from spam. In case it's not really
>spam, all the links in the message are maintained, but you don't have to
>suffer the images. This is keeping most of my users happy here.
>
>At 18:10 07/04/2003, you wrote:
> >Hi there!
> >
> >I was wondering if anyone had come up with a way to add a header or
> >perhaps prepend the subject line with something like {Porn?} based on the
> >language/content of an email?
> >
> >I want to be able to give our users something they can filter their mail
> >against if they don't want to receive ANY adult messages.
> >
> >Our customers like the ability to filter against {Spam?} in the subject
> >line for possible spam.
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >-Rich
>
>--
>Julian Field
>www.MailScanner.info
>Professional Support Services at www.MailScanner.biz
>MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support

--
Julian Field
www.MailScanner.info
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support