Suggestion

[Gavin Nelmes-Crocker]

I suspect this was a tongue in cheek reply but just in case

no I didn't mean for perl to analyse the picture the whole email was
SPAM and detected as such by SpamAssasin it was just unfortunate with
the content and placing of the inline sig.

I'm not sure I'd agree that a naked woman isn't dangerous though.  Any
woman can be a dangerous weapon if not handled properly. :-)

Gavin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: MailScanner mailing list
> [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Mike Kercher
> Sent: 29 October 2002 20:18
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: Suggestion
>
>
> I doubt there is ANY way perl can detect whether or not an
> image is or is not objectionable.  Further, the naked woman
> isn't dangerous content
> :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MailScanner mailing list
> [mailto:MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf > Of Gavin
Nelmes-Crocker
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 1:43 PM
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Suggestion
>
>
> I've just been setting up a V4 system and noticed an awkward
> oddity - if I forward some mail to it it gets scanned virus
> free but I also have spamassasin working which as I expected
> it detects it as spam and marks it accordingly in the subject.
>
> The awkward bit is that the inline txt that gets added
> basically says the mail has been checked for dangerous
> content etc and found to be clean - I say awkward as the demo
> I picked the inline text appeared directly below a fairly
> naked woman - a statement some people might not agree with.
>
> Is it possible to add some sort of rule that says if its
> virus free but detected as spam then add this inline message
> - so that you can have one that says virus free but dubious
> content or something like that.
>
> What does anyone else think  and of course Julian is it possible
>
> Regards
>
> Gavin
>