iframe dilemma: a compromise?

David Lee t.d.lee at DURHAM.AC.UK
Wed Nov 6 14:17:02 GMT 2002

On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Julian Field wrote:

> So, say you have
>          Allow IFrame Tags = yes
> but you also have a new option
>          Convert Dangerous HTML to Text = yes
> then the message contents would be allowed through (by the 1st option) but
> it would be stripped down to plain text (by the 2nd option). The definition
> of "Dangerous" in this context is HTML containing either IFrame tags or
> Object Codebase tags.

That sounds like the sort of thing I had envisaged.  Thanks.

Naturally, if a back-port to 3.x were also reasonable, that, too, would be
nice.  And, of course, I would volunteer to help verify its working.


:  David Lee                                I.T. Service          :
:  Systems Programmer                       Computer Centre       :
:                                           University of Durham  :
:  http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/            South Road            :
:                                           Durham                :
:  Phone: +44 191 374 2882                  U.K.                  :

More information about the MailScanner mailing list