iframe dilemma: a compromise?
t.d.lee at DURHAM.AC.UK
Wed Nov 6 14:17:02 GMT 2002
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Julian Field wrote:
> So, say you have
> Allow IFrame Tags = yes
> but you also have a new option
> Convert Dangerous HTML to Text = yes
> then the message contents would be allowed through (by the 1st option) but
> it would be stripped down to plain text (by the 2nd option). The definition
> of "Dangerous" in this context is HTML containing either IFrame tags or
> Object Codebase tags.
That sounds like the sort of thing I had envisaged. Thanks.
Naturally, if a back-port to 3.x were also reasonable, that, too, would be
nice. And, of course, I would volunteer to help verify its working.
: David Lee I.T. Service :
: Systems Programmer Computer Centre :
: University of Durham :
: http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ South Road :
: Durham :
: Phone: +44 191 374 2882 U.K. :
More information about the MailScanner