good version of SpamAssassin?
Steve Evans
sevans at FOUNDATION.SDSU.EDU
Fri Nov 1 18:19:50 GMT 2002
Although my false negative rate is through the roof. Something to pay
attention to.
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
(619) 594-0653
-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Field [mailto:mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: good version of SpamAssassin?
At 17:17 01/11/2002, you wrote:
>I vaguely remember there being some problem with a certain version of
>SA. Was I imagining this? I am about to go from 2.31 to 2.43 and wanted
>to ensure I wasn't buggering something up.
2.40, 2.41 and 2.42 were trouble. 2.43 is fine.
--
Julian Field Teaching Systems Manager
jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
Tel. 023 8059 2817 University of Southampton
Southampton SO17 1BJ
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list