good version of SpamAssassin?

Steve Evans sevans at FOUNDATION.SDSU.EDU
Fri Nov 1 18:19:50 GMT 2002


Although my false negative rate is through the roof.  Something to pay
attention to.

Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
(619) 594-0653 

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Field [mailto:mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK] 
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 9:20 AM
To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: good version of SpamAssassin?


At 17:17 01/11/2002, you wrote:
>I vaguely remember there being some problem with a certain version of 
>SA. Was I imagining this? I am about to go from 2.31 to 2.43 and wanted

>to ensure I wasn't buggering something up.

2.40, 2.41 and 2.42 were trouble. 2.43 is fine.
--
Julian Field                Teaching Systems Manager
jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk         Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
Tel. 023 8059 2817          University of Southampton
                             Southampton SO17 1BJ




More information about the MailScanner mailing list