small hole in SpamAssassin check?
mailscanner at BARENDSE.TO
Fri Nov 1 08:26:48 GMT 2002
Indeed, the option was set to no.
Strange though because it is just a porn spam mail which should have
triggered some of SA options.
Anyways, will keep looking!
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Julian Field wrote:
> Compliments to Matt, I hadn't thought of that! :-)
> At 22:05 31/10/2002, you wrote:
> >Ok, do you have the following things set in your mailscanner.conf?
> >Use SpamAssassin = yes
> >Always Include SpamAssassin Report = yes
> >Note that a spamcheck header will not be included for nonspam mails unless
> >the always include option is set.
> >At 09:20 PM 10/31/2002 +0100, Remco Barendse wrote:
> >>No, no exceptions made :)
> >>The mail is being bounced by a regular isp to my box, neither the ISP
> >>domain nor the sender's domain are on any list.
> Julian Field Teaching Systems Manager
> jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
> Tel. 023 8059 2817 University of Southampton
> Southampton SO17 1BJ
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner