small hole in SpamAssassin check?

[Remco Barendse]

Indeed, the option was set to no.

Strange though because it is just a porn spam mail which should have
triggered some of SA options.

Anyways, will keep looking!

On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Julian Field wrote:

> Compliments to Matt, I hadn't thought of that! :-)
>
> At 22:05 31/10/2002, you wrote:
> >Ok, do you have the following things set in your mailscanner.conf?
> >
> >Use SpamAssassin = yes
> >Always Include SpamAssassin Report = yes
> >
> >Note that a spamcheck header will not be included for nonspam mails unless
> >the always include option is set.
> >
> >At 09:20 PM 10/31/2002 +0100, Remco Barendse wrote:
> >>No, no exceptions made :)
> >>
> >>The mail is being bounced by a regular isp to my box, neither the ISP
> >>domain nor the sender's domain are on any list.
>
> --
> Julian Field                Teaching Systems Manager
> jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk         Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
> Tel. 023 8059 2817          University of Southampton
>                              Southampton SO17 1BJ
>
>


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.