{SPAM?} Re: Virus report e-mail

[David Sullivan]

On 30 Jun 2002 at 18:19, Julian Field wrote:

> At 18:11 30/06/2002, you wrote:
> >One good reason not to is that .uk is listed, that'll be why rfc-ignorant
> >flagged it.
>
> The whole country? Wow! Now that's what I call a broad brush...

http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-whois.html

3.) If a TLD does not have a working, public, free of charge WHOIS registry working
and providing all the necessary contact information, then by definition no domain in
that TLD is RFC954-compliant, and that would make the entire TLD a viable candidate
for listing.
UK domains don't have any contact information (yet) in their whois listing so in it goes
..

If anything it illustrates that if you're going to be using a  blacklist service you need to
research exactly what is listed and why.

Regards

David
==============================================================
This communication may contain privileged or confidential information which
is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please note that you may not distribute or use this
communication or the information it contains.  If this e-mail has reached you
in error, please delete it and any attachment.

Internet communications are not secure and Barnet College does not accept
legal responsibility for the content of this message.  Any views or opinions
expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of Barnet College.

Please note that Barnet College reserves the right to monitor the
source/destinations of all incoming or outgoing e-mail communications.
==============================================================