{SPAM?} spamassassin required hits adjustment.
Hancock, Scott
HancockS at MORGANCO.COM
Tue Jun 25 21:54:30 IST 2002
Thanks for the "proof read" Julian.
I've got bigger problems. SA suddenly started rating most of my mail at 255
(including all mail from this list). It also appears to be called twice
consecutively
<snip>
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: SpamAssassin (255 hits)
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: SpamAssassin (255 hits)
<snip>
I turned off SA for now. I will investigate further tomorrow.
> If someone feels like writing it...
Ok, fair enough. I've got a long way to go before I can pitch in, but its a
personal goal.
Thanks again
Scott Hancock
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Field [mailto:mailscanner at ECS.SOTON.AC.UK]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:18 PM
> To: MAILSCANNER at JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: {SPAM?} spamassassin required hits adjustment.
>
>
> At 21:18 25/06/2002, you wrote:
> >Previous posts stated that to adjust the hit rating for
> spamassasin with
> >mailscanner, one should edit the /root/.spamassassin/user_prefs file
> >
> >This file on my system (debian 2.4.18, ms 3.13.2-2, SA 2.20)
> has one line.
> >
> >required_hits 10
> >
> >Is this correct? I was hoping to find an example of this
> file somewhere.
> >All of the pointers to such a file that I've found have been
> dead ends.
>
> Should be. Do your SA reports indicate that it is using the new value?
>
> >Also, any chance of that sendmail config to report the hit
> ratings making it
> >to exim?
>
> If someone feels like writing it...
> --
> Julian Field Teaching Systems Manager
> jkf at ecs.soton.ac.uk Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
> Tel. 023 8059 2817 University of Southampton
> Southampton SO17 1BJ
>
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list