Julian Field jkf at
Wed Jun 5 13:44:54 IST 2002

At 01:25 05/06/2002, you wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 10:50:26AM -0700, Paul Fries wrote:
> > Yes. Spamd/spamc provides a huge speed improvement.
> >
> > I maintain 4 very busy mail servers. 2 of them use
> > sendmail/mailscanner/spamassassin and the other 2 use
> > qmail/qmail-scanner/spamassassin.
>The discrepancy is likely caused by the fact that we have commented out
>the "compile_now" in the initialisation of SA in
># JKF 7/1/2002 Commented out due to it causing false positives
>#$SAspamtest->compile_now(); # Saves me recompiling all the modules every time
>As it was causing problems. You could try uncommenting it and see whether the
>bugs in SA that were being tickled by it have gone away...

I would be very grateful if a few people could test this please. If the
bugs in SA have gone away, I can re-enable this line and speed it all up again.
Julian Field                Teaching Systems Manager
jkf at         Dept. of Electronics & Computer Science
Tel. 023 8059 2817          University of Southampton
                             Southampton SO17 1BJ

More information about the MailScanner mailing list